Investigating biochar as a net-negative emissions strategy in …

Table of Contents
Issue Date

This study evaluates the sustainability of biochar production and explores existing barriers and feasible opportunities for biochar in Colombia. High investment costs and inadequate policies are highlighted as the key barriers for biochar production and use.

Published on 24 August 2023
Eileen Torres
Eileen Torres
Research Associate

Maria Xylia
Maria Xylia
Senior Research Fellow

Francis X. Johnson
Francis X. Johnson
Senior Research Fellow

Read the paper Open access

Citation
Torres-Morales, E., Khatiwada, D., Xylia, M., & Johnson, F.X. (2023). Investigating biochar as a net-negative emissions strategy in Colombia: Potentials, costs, and barriers. Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 6, 100229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2023.100229.

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2023.100229

Biochar is identified as a land-based mitigation technology (LMT) and a net-negative emissions technology (NET) with significant potential for mitigating climate change and providing o-benefits. Transforming residual biomass into biochar can potentially avoid CO2 emissions to be rapidly released to the atmosphere.

This study aims to assess the sustainability of biochar production in Colombia as a NET. The research consists of five steps, literature review, expert elicitation, estimation of agricultural residues for biochar production, evaluation of biochar’s CO2 mitigation potential, and techno-economic analysis of biochar under different biomass availability and technologies scenarios. The authors’ findings indicate that approximately 10% of agricultural residual biomass can be transformed into biochar and reintegrated into the soil. Over a 100-year period, each tonne of biochar in the soil has the potential to avoid emissions of 1 to 2.2 t of CO2eq. Cost-wise, biochar production cost structure depends on the pyrolysis technology used.

The cost structure of biochar production depends on the pyrolysis technology used. The authors find that raw feedstock represent the main cost component, ranging from 64% to 74% of total costs for artisan-made equipment, and 33% to 34% for specialized pyrolysis equipment. Capital investments, fixed costs, and raw feedstock account for the remaining costs. Their results highlight that the net present value (NPV) is most sensitive to biomass transport distance, biomass price and biomass humidity. These findings can be used internationally for navigating the production, mitigation potentials, costs, and barriers of biochar, and devising deployment and market creation strategies.